Was Jesus born in a barn?

A Christmas play

No, probably not.

The popular imagining of the first Christmas, with innkeepers putting up ‘house full’ signs and finally pointing Joseph and Mary to an animal shed out the back, is unlikely to be the way it all happened.

Dr Lynn Cohick, Professor of New Testament at Wheaton College, spoke at St Paul’s last Sunday, and pointed out 3 reasons why that popular view of the first Christmas is unlikely:

1. In Middle Eastern culture, there is no way that a town would have not looked after one of their own, let alone a couple expecting a baby. The residents of the town would have done everything they could to accommodate the couple, out of hospitality, and for the honour of their town.

2. Bethlehem did not have hotels as we understand them. Instead, those who could afford them would build a ‘guest room’. The word in Luke’s gospel translated ‘inn’ (katalyma) is elsewhere translated in Luke as ‘upper room’- it was all of these ‘guest rooms’ that were full in the Christmas narrative.

3. Homes in Bethlehem were divided into 2 rooms: one for living/ cooing/ sleeping, and another for the animals. This is similar to modern day Masai homes which have a similar design. Animals were kept inside at night for their welfare and for security.

1st century Middle Eastern middle eastern floor plan, as per Kenneth Bailey (I don’t think it’s his Lego, though…)

So what happened?

Joseph and Mary stayed with another peasant family, who had no room in their normal living quarters or guests space, but accommodated them under the same roof in the best way they could.

Dr Cohick’s observations drew from Kenneth Bailey’s work on understanding Jesus through aide Eastern eyes – you can read some of his work on the Luke Christmas passages here.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Santa explained

😉

Santa: venn diagram

Santa: venn diagram

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Can we all just get along? Guy Sebastian and peace on earth

I have been a long time admirer of Guy Sebastian. I watched him win Australian Idol all those years ago, and I have always been impressed by his vocal skills. The Memphis Album is a favourite.

I was fascinated to hear his new song performed on TV the other night. The words are below:

Some only want some shelter
Someone a mansion in the sky
Some want a thousand virgins
Some move battle with their mind

[Pre-Chorus]
And when all the worlds collide
All they know is too divide
And it’s easy if their faceless
To hate the other side
And the others caught between
Are the only ones to bleed
And the ones they leave behind
Can only sit and cry

[Chorus]
Dear God, dear soul
Dear Mary , Mohammed
Can we just get along
Can we just get along
Dear heart, dear life
Dear soldier, dear martyr
Where did we go wrong,
Can we all just get along

[Verse]
Some set fire to crosses
Some fight the right to cross their dream
Some don’t believe at all
But do anything to make the news

[Pre-Chorus]
And when all the worlds collide
All they know is too divide
And it’s easy if their faceless
To hate the other side
And the others caught between
Are the only ones to bleed
And the ones they leave behind
Can only sit and cry

[Chorus]
Dear God, dear soul
Dear Mary , Mohammed
Can we just get along
Can we just get along
Dear heart, dear life
Dear soldier, dear martyr
Where did we go wrong,
Can we all just get along

[Bridge]
Maybe if we’d work together
We’d already have a heaven here on earth

I was fascinated by this song because it is essentially John Lennon’s “Imagine” in a new dress for 2012. It is born of the same angst – a burden that has arisen by looking around the world and seeing all the fighting, and observing that lots of the fighting is done by people who claim to be religious (although I note the reference to people who don’t believe anything but do anything to get on the news). This sort of thinking leads to people dying, and people crying.

In many ways I feel the same, as does the average Aussie, I reckon. Why all the fighting? Is it really all that important? Can’t we all just stop it and get along, and talk about the cricket for a change? I mean, how long has Ponting got anyway?… And so the song is likely to go gang-busters here in Australia, because it will appeal to the Aussie sense of not-taking-yourself-too-seriously, urging people to pull-their-heads-in and get on with living life.

I’d love to endorse the message, but if you scratch just a little bit under the lyrics, I’m not sure it will stand under the burden of its own message. Mohammed said there was one way to Allah, and it was through him. Mary apparently will get you round about access to God, though Protestants would dispute her role in accessing the divine. Atheists think the very idea of asking any of these for peace is like talking to the fairies at the bottom of the garden. And none of those reckon that they can just give up their way of thinking any more now than when Lennon’s anthem debuted.

May I humbly suggest another way? The answer lies in Guy’s line: ‘Where did we go wrong?’ A possible answer: according to Jesus, humanity was created with 2 primary operating instructions. 1. Love God above else. 2. Love others as you love yourself. Guy has noted that we are really bad at the 2nd one as a human race, but its not because people believe in God. It’s because they don’t believe in him enough.

This Christmas, Jesus will be celebrated as the ‘Prince of Peace.’ This is not only because he makes relationship with the Maker possible again, but also because from that relationship flows a changed attitude to relationship with others. True followers of Jesus don’t give up on the idea of truth, but they love as they have been loved, and they give up assertion of self in favour of serving others as they have been served by Jesus. Those who don’t just aren’t taking it seriously enough, or being true to their confession.

I long for peace, but I’m not sure that pretending all the religions can just get along is the answer. For mine, it lies in following the way of the Prince of Peace.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Bible in a minute – video

Leave a comment

Filed under bible

Preaching and revelation

“Preaching is more than the oral communication of information, no matter how biblical and divine that information may be. Rather, we should think in terms of what might be called “re-revelation.” Across the centuries, God disclosed himself – he revealed himself – in great events (eg. the burning bush, the exodus, the resurrection of Jesus); he disclosed himself supremely in the person of his Son. But very commonly he revealed himself by his words. Perennially we read, “The word of the Lord came to such-and-such a prophet.” So when that Word is re-announced, there is a sense in which God, who revealed himself by that Word in the past, is re-revealing himself by that same Word once again.

Preachers must bear this in mind. Their aim is more than to explain the Bible, however important that aim is. They want the proclamation of God’s Word to be a revelatory event, a moment when God discloses himself afresh, a time when the people of God know that they have met with the living God. They know full well that for the Scriptures to have this revelatory impact the Spirit of God must apply that Word deeply to the human heart, so that preaching must never be seen as a mere subset of public oratory. Both the content (the Bible is God’s Word) and the transformative empowering (the Spirit himself) transcend any merely mechanical view of preaching.”

D.A.Carson, ‘Challenges for the 21st Century Pulpit’, in L.Ryken & T.Wilson (eds.), Preach the Word: Essays on Expository Preaching in Honor of R.Kent Hughes (Wheaton: Crossway, 2007), 176.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Owen, on the Holy Spirit, sonship and prayer

“A sense of God’s relation to us as a Father, is necessary to this delight [ie. prayer]. We may use other titles and appellations of God, but as a Father he is the ultimate object of all evangelical worship, of all our prayers: so it is expressed in that holy and divine description of it, given us by the apostle, “Through Christ we have access by the Spirit to the Father’ (Eph 2:18). No tongue can express, no mind can reach the heavenly placidness and soul – satisfying sweetness which are intimated in these words. Without a due apprehension of God in this relation, no man can pray as he ought; and we can have no sense hereof but by the Holy Ghost, who ‘bears witness with our spirits, that we are the children of God’ (Rom 8:16).”

John Owen, The Holy Spirit, 358.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Owen, on how afflictions refine the believer

 

(Afflictions purify believers from sin.)

“And this they do by an efficacy communicated to them by the spirit of God; for by the cross of Christ, they were cut off from the curse of the first covenant, to which all their evils belonged, and implanted into the covenant of grace. The tree of the cross being cast into the waters of affliction, has rendered them wholesome and medicinal. Christ being the head of the covenant, all the afflictions of his members are originally his (Is 63:9), and they all tend to increase our conformity to him in holiness.”

John Owen (puritan), The Holy Spirit; His Gifts and Power, 296.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Mac Dictation vs Proverbs

Just tried speaking Proverbs 3:5-6 into Mac dictation in Pages, and got the following:

“Trust in the Lord with all your heart,
and lean on your own understanding;
in all your waist acknowledge him,
and he will make your pastorate.”

What is it trying to tell me?!!

🙂

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Calvin, on whether my dog will go to heaven

Some questions have been around a long time!

“Mr Calvin, will my dog go to heaven?”

“Certain subtle, but scarce sober men, demand whether all kinds of beasts shall be immortal; but, if these speculations may have loose reins, whither will they carry us? Therefore, let us be content with this simple doctrine, that there shal be such a temperature, and such a decent order, that nothing shall appear either deformed or ruinous.”

Commentary on Romans, 218-19

🙂

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Our attitudes to relationships – 2011 Australian survey

The 2011 Relationships Indicators Survey provides an opportunity to increase our understanding of relationships in Australia – intimate relationships, family relationships and connection with community.  The overall objective of the research is to provide a statistically sound representative sample of feelings, attitudes and opinions about relationships within the Australian population.

This is the 7th Relationships Indicators Survey undertaken by Relationships Australia and is sponsored by CUA.

One of the key findings from the 2011 research was that more than 40 percent of Australians who use an average of four methods of technology to communicate with their friends or family feel lonely, compared to 11 percent of those who use one form of technology.

The survey results also revealed the most common reasons for relationship breakdowns in Australia, with ‘financial stress’ being the leading cause (26 percent), followed by ‘communication difficulties’ (25 percent), ‘different expectations/values’ (23 percent) and ‘lack of trust’ (22 percent).

Read the “Relationships Indicators 2011 Survey” here. (from Relationships Australia)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized